The Snapper: Millersville University

This Week's Poll

Will you be following Governor Corbett's budget announcement on February 7th?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Advertisements

`

The Snapper on Facebook

The Snapper on Facebook
Browsing: / Home / 2009 / January / 21 / Obama does not have his work cut out
Print Email Shortlink

Obama does not have his work cut out

By Cameron Kehler on January 21, 2009 in Opinion

The upcoming year for Barrack Obama will be a long and busy one.

Issues ranging from the War in Iraq, the economic situation and foreign relations are just a few of the whirlwind events that will likely engulf the new President’s attention in 2009.

But the one issue that will dominate the administration from the start is the economic stimulus package that is currently being debated in Congress.

Obama’s place in future history books could very likely be staked on how he handles the economic downturn.

To most political pundits and average citizens, the idea of using taxpayer dollars to bail out established American companies like General Motors or Wells Fargo is a necessary idea. We cannot let such large companies that employ thousands of people go under.
Most of America will gladly watch billions of hard earned taxpayer dollars go to help such companies stave off bankruptcy.

But there is another point to consider in all of this. The list of companies looking for government handouts has grown to a size that could cross the Grand Canyon and back.
Not all of these corporations should receive even a dime in federal assistance. You heard me right; Some should be allowed to either fail or get bought out by someone else.  So let me explain this before I get any messages saying I am crazy to think, let alone write this for all to see.

Since we live in a free market economy, the life of a business is determined on how well
they can make profits and compete in the marketplace.

Companies that do well thrive and expand, while those that cannot succeed ultimately fail.

This cycle ensures that only the most efficient and beneficial to the economy prosper, because they do the best job of delivering the necessary goods and services. Throwing money at corporations that have failed is a waste of taxpayer dollars since it upsets the business cycle that promotes only the profitable businesses; not to mention some of these companies will still fail in the end

When one company goes under, another will step in to take its place or another will find a better way to operate. For example, should the Federal Government have bailed out vinyl record companies when CD’s came along?

Of course not. Compact discs were more advanced and had more applications than records ever could.

New jobs were created in various other industries and those who might have lost jobs in records, found new ones in industries created by the new technology.  It is a message that might be hard to take in for some, but it is a lesson that those in Washington would do well to hear.

Share this on: Mixx Delicious Digg Facebook Twitter
83:11politicsvolume 83
  • Related Stories
  • Most Popular
  • Track team run New York City
  • Swimming make a splash at EY Invitational
  • Freshman wrestlers prove to be strong competition in Boiling Spring, N.C. matches over the weekend
  • Game at West Chester goes down to the wire
  • Men’s road trip to West Chester ends in defeat
  • Mashira Newman nets her 1000th career point
  • Protests against Proposition 8 get ugly
  • The erosion of states’ rights
  • No reason for men to wear earrings
  • Atheists more familiar with Bible than Christians
  • One Nation Under God? Injustice to Atheists
  • This Is It: Michael Jackson and his last musical role
← Previous Next →